<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reputation Management &#187; Search Engine Reputation Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reputationmanagers.com/blog/category/search-engine-reputation-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reputationmanagers.com/blog</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:52:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Even winning a lawsuit won&#8217;t take down defamatory content</title>
		<link>http://reputationmanagers.com/blog/even-winning-a-lawsuit-wont-take-down-defamatory-content/</link>
		<comments>http://reputationmanagers.com/blog/even-winning-a-lawsuit-wont-take-down-defamatory-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 15:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Reputation Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reputationmanagers.com/blog/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This just shows you the serious nature of defamatory content online and how worried you should be about it. This married couple gets bashed by a disgruntled family member, wins an injunction in court and they still cannot get the internet slander removed from rip off report. The problem still is that the person who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just shows you the serious nature of defamatory content online and how worried you should be about it. This married couple gets bashed by a disgruntled family member, wins an <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=119702">injunction in court</a> and they still cannot get the <a href="http://www.internetslander.com">internet slander</a> removed from rip off report. The problem still is that the person who wrote the comments are liable, not the website. Judges don&#8217;t want to start forcing websites to take things down as it will start hurting the &#8220;interactivity on the web&#8221;. While I would never want the freedom of interaction to be restricted online, if something is flat out defamatory, and it told so in a court of law, Rip Off Report should have to remove it.
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>We know first hand how this couple feels. We have also been attacked by a competitor and so called &#8220;Spam Complainers&#8221; in Rip Off Report. We had to use our tools to fight it so no one could find it.
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>One day, something will be done, I am sure of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reputationmanagers.com/blog/even-winning-a-lawsuit-wont-take-down-defamatory-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
